CyclopsWasRight
Well, he was.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,815
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Probably won't happen but i'd like them it to be set in the 70's. And for Reed and Sue to be together already, possibly with a young Franklin or Valeria.
Considering how DOFP is poised to do a lot of money this summer they can say DOFP
Back In 2012 Avengers dominated may.Amazing Spider-man hit big In early july and 2 weeks later Dark Knight rises hit even bigger.
All fox has to do Is get FF out before batmna Vs SUperman.Ant-man has bigger trouble opening 2 weeks after BVS.Ant-man Is third tier character especilly when not with avengers.Disney had previews for the lone ranger all over the place yet that film still bombed.And how many years have wright been on this film?
They have to make that money first before I'm convinced. XM-FC nor TW made much..
Spider-Man > Fantastic Four.. C'Mon, Thats really reaching..

The Wolverine made more than Captain America
thats not what he said
They could say "from the studio that brought you Avatar, Alien, Die Hard The Star Wars Saga, Titanic and hundreds of others"![]()
By 5mil? taking in account
Star Power Hugh Jackman > Chris Evans?
who's more disappointed?
the watch the what CA:TWS does. Then we can talk
thats not what he said
It is what he said. He's saying that like the Spider-Man tentpole(Avengers and TDKR) the FF can achieve the same success in between Comic Book Films (A2 and BM vs SM). I could be wrong though being that the point was that TDKR was released 2 weeks after ASM.. but even still. With Jurassic and Assassins Creed there's still not much room for the FF assuming they can even start production by Dec (which they won't)
yup thats not what he said
Probably won't happen but i'd like them it to be set in the 70's. And for Reed and Sue to be together already, possibly with a young Franklin or Valeria.
Some of the X-Men are in the 70's now. Plus it's closer to the 60s than present day.
He's a great actor indeed.
Sone news
http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/179579-terry-crews-wants-to-play-the-thing-in-fantastic-four
If Jackson can be Fury then why not Crews as Grimm?
Bc Jackson was clearly brought on to play the Ultimate version of the character which was based off his look. That casting made a lot of sense and wasn't random as Crews as Grimm would be. I guess it wouldn't matter much as he'd be in a suit after the origin bit of the movie, assuming they went that routeHe's a great actor indeed.
Sone news
http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/179579-terry-crews-wants-to-play-the-thing-in-fantastic-four
If Jackson can be Fury then why not Crews as Grimm?