webhead731
I'm a photographer
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2004
- Messages
- 16,862
- Reaction score
- 99
- Points
- 33
I really don't mind the suit but I cannot get over the exposed hand. It just looks like the actor took the glove off.
It looks that way because we know that's what it is. It's the movie's job to make us believe otherwise. Luke Skywalker's hand just looks like Luke's hand but we know after we see his cybernetic wrist being repaired it's not just a hand. Same for Vader's entire body. Vader looks like a guy in a suit but he isn't and we believe it because of what we know and eventually see in the movies. I thinking this will be similarly handled here. We'll see the cybernetic inner workings of the new Robocop's "human" hand or how the biological hand is interfaced with the cybernetic arm, either as he is built or if the hand gets damaged which is highly probable. This is a bit of fanboy wishful thinking but it would be cool to have the hand get damaged and while being repaired at some point Oldman or Keaton's character says "I thought we agreed on total body prosthesis. Lose the hand."I really don't mind the suit but I cannot get over the exposed hand. It just looks like the actor took the glove off.
Robocop is blonde?!
Robocop looks puffy
Robocop's cape looks like a fruit rollup and his logo is too small
Robocop has flame designs
Robocop's head looks like a bobblehead
Robocop looks like a basketball
It's more like they think everything is wrong, or stupid.
It comes down to this: they didn't want a remake, bc for them Robocop is PERFECT !!!!, so everything about this movie is wrong. Since this is a remake, they wanted to be a scene-by-scene remake and, because it's not, because it's a remake of the idea of a robot cop, not just a remake of the whole movie, everything about this movie shows that the people responsable by it don't "get" Robocop.
So, for instance, because in this movie they are showing Alex Murphy losing his humanity gradually, they complain it's wrong and stupid because it's the reverse of what the original Rocop did.Duh! That's the whole point!
Right. There were two options to bring Robocop back to the world. 1. A remake of the first film. or 2. A reboot/re-imagining. Both of which would elicit fanboy gripes. A remake would never live up to the first film. A reboot strays too far from the original story and character.It's more like they think everything is wrong, or stupid.
It comes down to this: they didn't want a remake, bc for them Robocop is PERFECT !!!!, so everything about this movie is wrong. Since this is a remake, they wanted to be a scene-by-scene remake and, because it's not, because it's a remake of the idea of a robot cop, not just a remake of the whole movie, everything about this movie shows that the people responsable by it don't "get" Robocop.
So, for instance, because in this movie they are showing Alex Murphy losing his humanity gradually, they complain it's wrong and stupid because it's the reverse of what the original Rocop did.Duh! That's the whole point!
The first film was a product of it's time, though much of the broader themes in it still resonate. A remake couldn't capture that again and would just be redundant. I hope this becomes the Batman Begins for Robocop. BB kept the heart of why the character was great but changed a lot of the more minor details about his story and arguably made them better taken as a whole. As much as I revere the first Robocop suit the fact that the times, and specifically technology, have drastically changed in 25 years dictate that the design had to be changed dramatically while keeping the soul of the character and the more iconic visual aspects of the original, namely the visor and the gun, which I believe they did. True, the all-black color scheme makes Robocop stand out less in a crowd but it makes more sense in a real-world application, assuming it's being approached from the Nolan-esque angle of real-worldness. Swat guys don't wear silver vests and leg protectors. A tactical superpowered police officer wouldn't be so gaudy either. The same as a guy dressing up in a Batsuit would likely forego a huge yellow oval and grey pants but that's a whole other fanboy argument. It also makes sense that he's sleeker and faster these days. The first Robo was quite slow and clunky, which felt right in 1987. I can't wait to see the finished scene of Robocop's visor deploying, his gun coming out of his leg and into his hand as he leaps off the stage to confront a badguy. Sounds like a potential geekout moment to me.
Regarding the hate toward the new costume, a thought: Robocop has worn the same exact costume with no alteration from 1987-2012. 25 years! I think that Robocop has been identified with that look for so long it makes the first serious change to his armor that much more of a shock to the public? Can anyone think of another superhero/sci-fi character that's maintained the same look for so long?
:cough-cough:Superman did
1938-2011
Thanks for saving me the trouble. I just now got over how absurd that reply was.
Fan art based off a leaked photo. Not bad. Really can't wait for something official.
![]()
While I really like the suit, the only thing I had issue with is the overall use of a rubberized look instead of a harder shell like the previous had.