Super Kal
whatever
- Joined
 - Sep 8, 2004
 
- Messages
 - 47,991
 
- Reaction score
 - 66
 
- Points
 - 73
 
Recognizable to the original films maybe but not something that its trying to be by itself, which Is makIng the effort of doing. Seriously, you people are holding onto the original look too much.
in doing so you start to separate yourself from the core audience.
you're trying to say something along the lines that Superman shouldn't wear a costume because it's holding to the original too much...
the visual appeal is part of the character. the color scheme is part of the character. not only does it make for a more visual appeal, but it also differentiates itself from other franchises... i said this before, and I'll say it again: this plain look makes it look too much like other franchises that include robots, or robotic like characters. compare the look of the characters in GJ JOE and this picture of this new Robocop... remove the movie titles from each of the pictures, and all mentions that distinguishes it from one another, and you will find that visual wise, they look exactly the same. the same black design, the same armor, almost the same plating... it's all the same basics.
you put a batman cowl on Robocop's head, and he'll look almost exactly like Batman.
this version of Robocop looks no different than a man dressed up in riot gear. it looks just as similar to Peru's anti-riot Delta Force.
this is why color variations are needed in a medium such as this. to distinguish him from others, to differentiate the character from the rest of the individuals around him. You dont give Superman civilian clothes to fight crime in. you give him a uniform that distinguishes himself to let others know ho he is.
a two-tone color scheme helps Robocop distinguish himself from the rest of the police force.
						
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 im glad they're going in a completely different route visually wise... again, IF this is indeed true