KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,990
- Reaction score
- 41,579
- Points
- 103
"Flecking".
Sounds dirty.
Sounds like what Jennifer Garner calls it when Ben is dancing alone with the Snyder Bat Suit on.

"Flecking".
Sounds dirty.
I thought the lenses in TDK looked kinda cool.
*shrugs*
Batman Forever, they get it, but those aren't the only two ways to do lenses in live action.
Plus..............
I thought the lenses in TDK looked kinda cool.
*shrugs*
the lenses work only when they're expressive. They look great in stills but would get pretty dull being in one position all the time. That's a huge reason Affleck's performance in Daredevil gets knocked so hard, imo.
So if they can find a way to make that fit believably in the context of the story, it's great. If not, it's hard for me to imagine the pure glowy white look working in the world of MOS. I could see contact lenses working though.
I thought they looked ok, a different shape would've been nice though, I'm definitely in the contacts camp though with the white eyes thing, have them be transparent when not in use.
the lenses work only when they're expressive. They look great in stills but would get pretty dull being in one position all the time. That's a huge reason Affleck's performance in Daredevil gets knocked so hard, imo.
So if they can find a way to make that fit believably in the context of the story, it's great. If not, it's hard for me to imagine the pure glowy white look working in the world of MOS. I could see contact lenses working though.
Yeah, I think the lenses are one of those things that shoud be used once or twice for some iconography shots, but not all the time. Have him wear them for night vision or something when he's in the dark, but then they vanish when the camera focuses on his face for a shot that shows his expression.
So I'm "trolling" cause I stated my opinion, and then backed it up by example in live action movies, and now you want me to "disengage"?Plus what? Are you seriously trying to say that we should base our expectations for an effect that could be performed in 2016 by one of the most skilled visual directors of all time on THIS???
![]()
From the guy who brought us THIS???
![]()
Okay dude, we get it. You're a troll.
Thank you, will now disengage.
A little likey this?
![]()
They were ok for a short little scene, but if those were full time I wouldn't be hot about it.I thought the lenses in TDK looked kinda cool.
*shrugs*
So I'm "trolling" cause I stated my opinion, and then backed it up by example in live action movies, and now you want me to "disengage"?
Yeah, keep making your "phenomenal" manips. Lenses for life and stuff, brahhhhh.![]()
They were ok for a short little scene, but if those were full time I wouldn't be hot about it.
No, you're trolling because of your ridiculous juvenile tone. Playing the Batman-movies list game with us like we're idiots isn't stating your opinion. It's just being puerile. And I didn't ask you to disengage.Just said that I'm done having a debate about the Batsuit with you.
Yeah, I'm for lenses in a couple choice scenes only. And I wouldn't throw a fit if we didn't get them in this movie. I just don't think they can or should be ruled out entirely because I'm sure Snyder could think of a way to do them. But if he doesn't...not a big deal.
i just want to see them use only for a detective mode.
Agreed, it's not fit worthy.Whatever they come up with, I'm sure Snyder will be trying to wow us. And he seems to know all the tricks, from practical, to in camera, to post. There has never been a time in movie making history when there were so many technical options available to make Batman as close to or as far from his comic/animated form, or an actor cast who's chin was as ideal as Batfleck's
I can't think of many things that could cause me to pitch a fit except for undue complication ala the puzzle-suit, or a suit of metal armor, and I doubt we're getting either of those things for the main Batsuit.
Wtf is wrong with something like this?