
Let us dream!!!
![]()

Batman is fake! Superman is fake! They're all fake!!!!!!!!!!
(insert BATMAN & ROBIN Arnold as Mr. Freeze "You lie!" gif)
Why are some of you guys talking like any of the Batsuit were really functional things? Simply, they're just costumes.
Because good artists actually care about purpose? To not care is lazy ass writing and characterization. Maybe as the audience it doesn't matter to you, but otherwise, it should absolutely mean something to the character, or you're possibly inferring something about the character you didn't intend.
To be be fair, most of the arguments were for ARMOR not black rubber, and affleck clearly also has armor, just with some fabric over it. The people against black rubber thought he didn't need armor because he's batman and can apparently dodge anything and everything.
Because good artists actually care about purpose? To not care is lazy ass writing and characterization. Maybe as the audience it doesn't matter to you, but otherwise, it should absolutely mean something to the character, or you're possibly inferring something about the character you didn't intend.
I just find it silly people are still going out of their way to bash the Nolan batsuits. There are some of us who liked those suits (plus a large proportion of the non-fanboy community) and besides there's a new non-nolan batsuit that exists now, so what is there to complain about?
I'm looking forward to seeing the Rocksteady rendition of the Nolan Batsuit. They did a remarkable job with the Burton Batsuit and I feel that the Nolan Batsuit could look great as well. Proportions really make an enormous difference.
Verisimilitude and absolute realism are not the same things.
You win a cookie.Verisimilitude and absolute realism are not the same things.
Where did they confirm that we'd be getting the other film suits?
No, of course not, but it is problematic that in seeking verisimilitude in bringing Batman's world to life, Nolan's team sought contrived explanations not supported in reality for capabilities in the comics when the actual technology depicted in the comics exists in real life and was in development at the time. You don't have to put Batman in cumbersome fantastical Kevlar plate armour when the thin, cloth-like nanofiber and/or Kevlar armour he is depicted as wearing in the comics actually exists in reality. That is where my criticism, which started this debate came from.

Of course this discussion is all in fun...as we wait for the film...but
Where does this thin nano fiber exist? Spider silk? Is the Bat exceptionally good at milking spiders?
The Kevlar cloth I have experience with has many layers and is fairly thick.
Allowing that Bruce is a gazillionair, and has access to the state of the art, x-peri mental tech, he could have better equipment. Hence the thin (presumably ) knife resistant, fire resistant, flexible outer shell, with armor plates and pads to help absorb the impacts.
Film makers can't rely on the entire audience to be up to date on the latest technology, so they cheat a bit to explain.
Some do it better than others. Nolan did it well in Begins, Favro did it well in IM.
Snyder did it well in MOS. all had faults, but not fatal flaws IMO.
At least it is more plausible than accepting that a guy wearing only a spandex jumpsuit is taking fire and being pummeled all day and yet survives...without a scratch.![]()