titansupes
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 11,628
- Reaction score
- 1,870
- Points
- 103
Yeah, I saw that. Got to feel for him.
Me thinks this Batman is just a grumpier a-hole, who throws tantrums without thinking too much into things. Maybe we should get used to it and not expect such a change just because a better writer/director is coming on board?
Was watching some scenes from the movie (terrible quality though), and i think i gave Affleck too much credit after watching this film in theaters twice. He's solid/good in this role, no doubt. But he's not "fantastic". He may be able to get to that high spot with better material, but for now i won't expect it. He plays this A-Hole version well though.
The majority of his Batman scenes have barely anything to do with him. It's all suit, stuntwork and a robot voice. The praise should come down to his Bruce Wayne. And it's solid good but not Bale good. He just has the right physical appearance for the character, which i believe is kinda clouding peoples judgement of him.
Alfred? Irons is a fantastic actor but his characterization is quite one dimensional. Business partner like attitude for most of it. Bats blows these dudes to bits from his Batwing, on way to the warehouse and seconds later, Alfred doesn't pay any mind to it. When he does ask him some questions, it's the uncle/nephew esque relationship that i talked about a week or two ago.
I also watched some scenes from TDK yesterday, and man, when Bruce nails that goon in the face with that gun in the penthouse, then proceeds to take the gun apart while walking straight. Pure f**kin Batman, determination. He's thinkin "no guns motherf**ker!". It's sooooooo Batman. Batfleck would have probably taken the gun, shot the guy with it, and kept the gun. I wonder if that guy in the warehouse (in bats v supes) would have SHOT him in the shoulder instead of stabbing, if Bats would have returned the favor and shot the thug in the goddamn shoulder too! Hahaha. Eye for an eye right??! He's kinda like a child who has to get his way and overreacts. Geoff Johns should be perfect then! "Shoot at my batmobile or Batwing? F**k you b**ch! Ima shoot your ass down."
I wonder if Zack is gonna screw up the characterization of Jim Gordon like he did with Lex, Supes and Bats? Cuz we know he kinda looked at Mark Zuckerberg in Social Network and said let's do a hammy version of that! I bet he cast J.K Simmons cuz he wants to turn Gordon into a shouting, hot-headed Commish who barks orders at policemen and calls out Batman on his s**t. All because he liked him in Whiplash/Spider-Man! Don't be surprised if we're kinda facepalming at Commissioner Gordon in 2017.
The angry, obsessive Bat fans are 100 times worse than Superman fans.A lot of "Superman is lame and their fans suck" and "Batman is cool s***!" from one guy.
Honestly, BvS Batman left a bad taste in my mouth too. I'm happy to see Affleck already getting a shot under another director, but there's also a part of me that fears he won't be much different from his BvS counterpart.
Thanks dude. Im only good with it because it'll be nice when im older to look back on all the different versions of Batman that made it to the big screen over the years. This "giant muscle bounded violent swearing Batman" as you put it, was always destined to make it on film. At some point. It's not surprising that Snyder was the one to give birth to it. It's a more extreme Frank Miller Bats, that's for sure. But i doubt i'll look back on this era with a smile. Unless Ayer/Affleck put the effort into changing him up.Awesome post. This EXACTLY sums up my feelings on this new direction they are taking with Batman on film. For me, its a weird experience to see so many people clamoring over Affleck's/Miller's version of Batman, to the point, that anything less than a giant muscle bounded violent swearing Batman isn't 'Batman" anymore. I grew up watching the reruns of the 60s show, read the o'neil comics as a kid, watched Batman 89 in high school and probably about 7 years ago read the dark knight returns for the first time. I can appreciate and like all the different versions of Batman, but its become that quote about "these civilized people...will eat each other" in there defense of Affleck's version. Like Shauner said, I thought Affleck was fine and maybe better material will make the difference, but for now, I wasn't blown away, like I was with Bale.
The only difference will be his lack of killing people and branding. I bet anything that's the only difference. When you got Geoff Johns writing, i don't see a reason to get excited beyond "Ohhhh gooodie! There won't be as much CG, we'll actually have Batman villains and not as many subplots!". Which sounds good in comparison to what we just sat through. But that ain't hard to beat!Honestly, BvS Batman left a bad taste in my mouth too. I'm happy to see Affleck already getting a shot under another director, but there's also a part of me that fears he won't be much different from his BvS counterpart.

Hahahaha, I had to go over there due to you guys' post.
It feels like OutofBoose is cracking due to all the BvS backlash.
I don't like a lot of Batfans, but Superman fans aren't that great either. Batman fans are worse because the fanbase is currently larger. If Superman were as popular as he used to be, he'd probably have plenty obnoxious, annoying fans as well.

^ I agree with everything.
I see TDKR's ending as Nolan's way of saying "WB, you can't touch this now that I'm done." I do understand that point of view and can see where he is coming from in terms of what could have happened to the franchise after Movie 3, but it hurts TDKR in present-day context (or at least in what was present-day context back in 2012).
I do find the "sacrifice" funny and pointless in retrospect. Batman vs. Superman looks entirely like a film just pushed by suits that will be a complete disaster. It looks like the second biggest CBM disaster within the foreseeable future (the first being Bay-Turtles reboot). Batman specifically has been made about an entire decade older than Superman and other superheroes, is stunt casted, and will be the crazy right-wing extremist we see in books like Dark Knight Returns/Kingdom Come. Despite Nolan's intentions with TDKR's ending to avoid Batman's film future being turned into a disaster, Batman's film future still looks like a complete disaster.
In some ways, it looks like more of a disaster than it would had been if Nolan's franchise continued. At least with Nolan's franchise, WB would have been forced to stick to a lot of the things people love about Batman in order for things to make sense continuity-wise. With a clean-slate, WB can do whatever the hell they want.
All this makes TDKR's ending even more disappointing IMO.

Hello, boys and girls. Would you like to read a blast from the past?
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=27620859&postcount=814
Sometimes I hate being right.![]()


I had to go and see this for myself, because I've seen him act really immature on the BvS boards. He's going nuclear on those SS threads. He was getting mad at Kane. Kane. How do you get mad at Kane?
The backlash against BvS is bringing out his inner troll.