Haha..ok...now that I would like to have seen..Imagine if Trump was the president in the movie.
"This Bane guy, I love him. I love this guy. He is a great guy. Believe me. He is gonna make Gotham great again. I read about him on the internet. He destroyed League of Shadows. Trust me folks"
Imagine if Trump was the president in the movie.
"This Bane guy, I love him. I love this guy. He is a great guy. Believe me. He is gonna make Gotham great again. I read about him on the internet. He destroyed League of Shadows. Trust me folks"
Reminds me of that guy from Batman: No Man's Land who turned from DJ to senator.Imagine if Trump was the president in the movie.
"This Bane guy, I love him. I love this guy. He is a great guy. Believe me. He is gonna make Gotham great again. I read about him on the internet. He destroyed League of Shadows. Trust me folks"
I completely agree ultimately. That's why I think it should probably be left alone. Not too many of the major trilogies have remained 'just' trilogies at this point. Not Star Wars, not Lord of the Rings. Soon Toy Story will have a fourth installment. I guess there will always be Back to the Future. Although even had that had an animated series. Honestly, I feel like animation would be the best possible way to play in that sandbox again without watering down the impact of the trilogy. Especially since there's already a bit a precedent for "semi-canon, but not really" with animation in that universe via Gotham Knight.
Ditto on Westworld for me, I thoroughly enjoyed the first season and have high hopes for the rest of the series. I actually fell off Person of Interest somewhere in the middle of season 2. I do enjoy the show and want to finish it eventually, but seeing Jonah's talents unleashed with a full blown HBO sci-fi is admittedly more appealing to me than somewhat of a network procedural (albeit a very clever one with a bigger story). I'm sure being the showrunner on PoI helped prepare him for the even more ambitious undertaking of something like WW though. I'll get around to finishing it at some point.
I usually really like Nerdwriter's videos, but I think he kind of makes a half-baked argument about Interstellar. Like, sure the Dylan Thomas poem gets repeated. Nearly all Nolan's films repeat key lines of dialogue, we know this. Matt Damon has a cameo. Okay?? Brand's speech on love, I will say is pretty on the nose and uncomfortable. But I think that is kind of the point of that scene, she's putting some of her deepest intuitions out there and Cooper kind of shrugs it off. Also you have to consider the context of the fact that they're alone in space, on a mission where mysterious beings have led them to this point and even intervened to get Cooper on the mission. It's not totally out of left field as something "other" has been at play the whole time. I also disagree with his notion that Nolan's editing encourages passivity. To me it's the exact opposite.
Personally, I think while you can't argue that Nolan has been splitting the audience a bit more with his latest efforts, I don't feel like he's lost control so much as he's been changing as a filmmaker. I still respect Nerdwriter's opinion, but I ultimately had a hard time deciphering what he was trying to say about Nolan and his ambition. He seemed to be celebrating it and lamenting it at once. I'd be curious to see what he thinks of Dunkirk, since it does seem to be pretty deliberately more straight forward and less heady than the likes of Interstellar and Inception, but will undoubtedly bring the visceral visual spectacle we've come to expect from Nolan.


