marvelman2006
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 2,546
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 33
I dig the design just wish there were some gray to break it up a bit.
The MantisIt looks more like a body suit compared to a man who is mostly machine. Looks like a generic gi joe suit, like here:
![]()
Exactly, Snuff. TR was a disaster from the get-go, this ones seems to be in the hands of more capable artists. As always, though, people are judging things out of context.
That's because that IS a robot. Not a Cyborg.
Grew up with Robocop. Loved it. Watched it again for the first time in forever this weekend. Holds up okay, but incredibly dated. Classic 80's action flick, complete with nudity and swearing. Plot's not all that complex, which in this case is a bad thing. Not very hard to put pieces together as to what's going on. The summary of the remake, if accurate, strikes me as a little more intriguing. The performances make up for it to a certain degree, however. Though campy and over the top, they do pack a lot of personality.
As for the nuts-and-bolts of the design (no pun intended), I love what we're seeing. I honestly can't understand the level of whining. Set photos aren't going to show the suit as it's intended to look while lit, in action, on a big screen. Oh no, his hand is showing too! So what? His mouth is showing. What's the freaking difference? He's not a robot anyway. He's got a s**t ton of prostheses. To me, that would naturally lend itself to looking like a suit. Hey, that's what we're getting! It makes sense!
Damn, I'm getting madder and madder writing this. Bottom line, people need to ease up the reactions. It's not bad at all. The original isn't so immaculate as to warrant such reverence by the filmmakers as is being demanded by some of you. This is a few out-of-context peeks that are hardly the whole story. Chill out.
Actually, it's the opposite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN9hhmVByqY
In the physical sense, RoboCop was almost entirely robot vs. actual human.
...going further:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RoboCopThe movie's depiction of Murphy's struggles in reasserting his humanity also deals with themes of identity. This is even touched upon in the cyborg's construction. On the Robocop: 20th Anniversary Collector's Edition DVD, Paul Sammon states:
"Rob Bottin and Paul Verhoeven, and Ed Neumeier had all come up with a concept that there would be such a potential for psychological disruption. Even if you had supposedly wiped someone's memories and emotions they'd still might have some kind of residual humanity where if they'd looked at themselves as a complete robot with no relation to their past organic form, they'd completely freak out and have a psychotic breakdown. So the idea was that surgeons had literally skinned off Alex Murphy's face and then placed it on the cyborg. So it's not like they transplanted his head, they just took his face off and laid it on the cyborg, and that was to give him his own little sense of identity.
The original RoboCop was basically a brain-in-a-jar.
It's like this new design completely misses the point entirely.
im talking beneath that... both story wise and aesthetically wise
Those aren't successful in making you believe it was a man first. Those look like Androids, not Cyborgs. Robocop is a cyborg. Those take away TOO much humanity.
Yeah but Robocop was just an Android with a face made of flesh. He didn't have any other original body parts.
![]()
They kept his brainYeah but Robocop was just an Android with a face made of flesh. He didn't have any other original body parts.
![]()
Calling Total Recall a "disaster" is a bit harsh. If there had been no original movie to compare it to, the new one would be considered a decent flick. I thought the visuals of Total Recall were pretty great, and the story was decent. It's not a super awesome movie, and it's not as good as the original, but it's far from a disaster.
Farrel was awesome as BullseyeTo me it's a disaster. And it has nothing to do with the original existing. It had Wiseman directing, 2 mediocre (at best) actresses, Farrel who's terrible in every non-UK movie and run of the mill visuals.
They kept his brain
Yeah. but those designs lack human proportions all together.
He lost his arm, not brainThat doesn't make sense. Murphy got his brains blown the f**k out. So it would've been pointless to keep a dead brain. Unless they were somehow able to re-grow the missing pieces of it.
He lost his arm, not brain
He was able to see CPU people messing with him

And he needs to eat a brown paste to sustain his organic systems.
Looking back it's really degrading for him to eat paste that looks like brown crap.
You can survive a shot in the head. They salvaged what they could from his brain and put it in the robotic body. That was the point of Murphy's memories and consequently humanity getting out, they stemmed from HIS brain.
Agreed. Gabrielle Giffords is a testament to that. Her recovery is amazing considering she shouldn't have survived.