Whoa, first: a nerd can be a war hero, and BAMF. Second: a nerd is not necessarily a geek or awkward socially or unconfident.
I (and I believe most people) have a definition of 'nerd' and 'geek' that are synonymous and apparently different than yours.
Here's what I got from Google:
nerd /nərd, noun
informalnoun: nerd; plural noun: nerds; noun: nurd; plural noun: nurds
1. a foolish or contemptible person who lacks social skills or is boringly studious.
If you have a unique definition of nerd, I think you'll have to define that more clearly to avoid confusion. We can't communicate effectively if you are using a different definition of nerd than the rest of us. Based on the above, accepted definition, I stand by my assertion that
Reed absolutely is not a nerd.
Third: If the last 20-30 years of FF comics have been bad... why are you still a fan? Waiting and hoping them to return to the Vietnam Vet Two-fisted Reed of the 70s?
You're putting words into my mouth. I'm no longer a regular reader, but I still have a fondness for the comics of my youth and modern interpretations that properly update those characters. Millar's "Ultimate FF" diverged dramatically from the basic elements that make the FF the FF - much more than other artist's and writer's interpretations.
I would make Reed a Vet of Afghanistan or Iran. That makes perfect sense and keeps the character faithful to what he has been for the past 50 years. But I never even said he had to be a Vet. I just said he can't be a nerd and used that as one, small element of his history and character that illustrates he's not the stereotypical nerd.
Fifth: You can't even read what I'm saying and respond to it, why should I think that you know anything about my mind, much less anyone else's based on communication that isn't even directed at you.
I'm not quite sure what you're saying here. Clearly miscommunication is a fact of the internet (as evidenced by your misinterpretation of things I have said). If/when I misinterpret something you've said, I'm more than happy to read your clarifications and I'll offer clarifications to my statements (as I'm doing here).
I would assume any of the 10's of thousands of words you've posted on here are intended for public consumption. If there are communications that you don't want me to read or interpret, why don't you send them in private messages rather than posting them publicly?
Finally: Reed is a the ultimate scientist... that makes him a lot of things, but one of those things is not: "best adapted in the modern day as a hard smoking impteuous weapons mastering vietnam war vet"
Reed is not simply the ultimate scientist and that's the key point. Read is the ultimate
team leader. For that, he needs to be strong and confident, and his war experience has always been a tool to illustrate that strength and confidence - not his impetuousness. I have no idea why you threw that in there. Soldiers certainly aren't known for being impetuous (at least not the ones who survive), Reed has never been impetuous and I've never suggested he should be.
And he doesn't need to be a Vet as long as he is a strong, confident, decisive leader. Reed's leadership capabilities are canon, other minor details on which you're fixating aren't . Millar and Tim Story didn't respect the canon of Reed's leadership abilities and that is one of many flaws of those works. (To be fair to Millar, he was doing a fairly drastic reinterpretation - which is fine as long as it's comfined to the comic pages. But when a drastically altered version of classic characters is considered a reasonable basis for a film representing those characters, I have a problem.)
For this film to adequately depict the FF, I believe one key element is that Reed needs to be a strong and confident leader.
That's why I had a problem when you described him as a nerd.